G.R.A.W sucks apparently

[Teowulf]

http://www.gamespot.com/xbox/action/...ml?sid=6146108

5.9/10 for the Xbox version, that sucks.

[Ten_In_2010]

Wow, that looks a lot different than the 360 version.

[Car15]

Haha, there are typos in a Tom Clancy game... my God, EA really screwed up Ubisoft (they bought a 20% share in the company, I believe).

[Joey]

Originally Posted by Car15

Haha, there are typos in a Tom Clancy game... my God, EA really screwed up Ubisoft (they bought a 20% share in the company, I believe).

I hope there's some sarcasm that I'm not sensing. Right?

[Trigun]

i don't get so now all of sudden that the 360 is out people have to go saying that graphics for current gen games are horrible now? thats just down right stupid.same thing with gameplay and everything.

[Joey]

Originally Posted by trigun@buttwiper.net

i don't get so now all of sudden that the 360 is out people have to go saying that graphics for current gen games are horrible now? thats just down right stupid.same thing with gameplay and everything.

I wouldn't doubt this game sucks. Quick ports are rarely ever good.

[Teowulf]

Originally Posted by trigun@buttwiper.net

i don't get so now all of sudden that the 360 is out people have to go saying that graphics for current gen games are horrible now? thats just down right stupid.same thing with gameplay and everything.

Well apparently the game was designed for the 360, and things had to be dumbed down for the original xbox.

[Trigun]

Originally Posted by Dee.Eff.Ess

I wouldn't doubt this game sucks. Quick ports are rarely ever good.

i know but seeing as how the 360 has better graphics and stuff now. when people review current gen games they might start blabering about how the graphics aren't as good btw ign is bull spit. i won't settle on a verdict until i actually play the game. 360 or not.

[kaioshade]

No, its not as good as the 360 version
No, it doesnt suck.
Adn people STILL read that stupid site?

[Car15]

Originally Posted by Dee.Eff.Ess

I hope there's some sarcasm that I'm not sensing. Right?

God I wish it was sarcasm. Scope this:

On December 20, 2004 Electronic Arts (EA) purchased a 19.9% stake in the firm. At the time, Ubisoft released a statement saying they considered the purchase "hostile" until they had further information on EA's intent.

Source of quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubisoft

[Synyster gates]

Originally Posted by trigun@buttwiper.net

i don't get so now all of sudden that the 360 is out people have to go saying that graphics for current gen games are horrible now? thats just down right stupid.same thing with gameplay and everything.

because once you see better graphics, the old ones dont cut it. example:i cant play FF7 cause the graphics are ****ty.
2D games stand the test of time way better then 3D ones.

[Joey]

Originally Posted by Car15

God I wish it was sarcasm. Scope this:



Source of quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubisoft

I know they bought stock in Ubisoft. I was talking about the "EA Screwed them up" comment.

[Trigun]

Originally Posted by kaioshade

No, its not as good as the 360 version
No, it doesnt suck.
Adn people STILL read that stupid site?

i think that site is stupid too.

[Trigun]

Originally Posted by Midnight Malevolence

because once you see better graphics, the old ones dont cut it. example:i cant play FF7 cause the graphics are ****ty.
2D games stand the test of time way better then 3D ones.

buts thats what is really hapening most gaming magazines say that current gen games look like butt but i don't see what they are talking about.like how they said Disgea's graphics were on par with ps1 and when i actually go and play the game the graphics are way better than ps1

[brain_stew]

Originally Posted by Dee.Eff.Ess

I wouldn't doubt this game sucks. Quick ports are rarely ever good.

It's not a port, it's a totally different game made by a different dev house, which is evidently much worse than it's 360 cousin.

With regards to the EA comment, sure they bought shares in Ubi but they have ZERO say in the running of the company at this moment in time.

[Visualizer]

Originally Posted by Midnight Malevolence

because once you see better graphics, the old ones dont cut it. example:i cant play FF7 cause the graphics are ****ty.
2D games stand the test of time way better then 3D ones.

Weird, because I can go back and play Super Mario 64 and have a blast, and the graphics for that game weren't great at all by today's standards. Same with FFVII. Graphics do not make the game. The experience does.

[MasterMagneto]

Originally Posted by Midnight Malevolence

because once you see better graphics, the old ones dont cut it. example:i cant play FF7 cause the graphics are ****ty.
2D games stand the test of time way better then 3D ones.

VERY true, after playing 360 for so long, I went back to play some Super Mario Sunshine and realized that it didnt look as good as it used to. And when are you guys gonna stop basing your opinions on reviews? Last time I checked, I dont have some guy at a magazine telling me which food I like, the same goes with games. Think for yourself people.

[Crimson_Tears]

Originally Posted by Midnight Malevolence
because once you see better graphics, the old ones dont cut it. example:i cant play FF7 cause the graphics are ****ty.
2D games stand the test of time way better then 3D ones.

Yeah, your right man people need to know that old school was the bomb!

[Crimson_Tears]

Originally Posted by billythekilly

http://www.gamespot.com/xbox/action/...ml?sid=6146108

5.9/10 for the Xbox version, that sucks.

I knew that was going to happen they dont give a crap about the older console they put more work into the X360 game and the ones on the older systems they just make it trash and not really even try...