Who's the chick on the bottom of your sig?
Printable View
Who's the chick on the bottom of your sig?
I already have ubuntu im dualbooting
Hiratai looks like olan.
That chick is -lilfibz-...heheZitat:
Zitat von gmansixfo
k.Zitat:
Zitat von androidkaita
Hiratai=olan..... o-m-g I knew it.Zitat:
Zitat von Mister Chief
kZitat:
Life is a condition that distinguishes organisms from inorganic objects, i.e. non-life, and dead organisms, being manifested by growth through metabolism, reproduction, and the power of adaptation to environment through changes originating internally. A physical characteristic of life is that it feeds on negative entropy. In more detail, according to physicists such as John Bernal, Erwin Schrödinger, Wigner, and John Avery, life is a member of the class of phenomena which are open or continuous systems able to decrease their internal entropy at the expense of substances or free energy taken in from the environment and subsequently rejected in a degraded form (see: entropy and life).
A diverse array of living organisms can be found in the biosphere on Earth. Properties common to these organisms—plants, animals, fungi, protists, archaea and bacteria—are a carbon- and water-based cellular form with complex organization and heritable genetic information. They undergo metabolism, possess a capacity to grow, respond to stimuli, reproduce and, through natural selection, adapt to their environment in successive generations.
An entity with the above properties is considered to be a living organism, that is an organism that is alive hence can be called a life form. However, not every definition of life considers all of these properties to be essential. For example, the capacity for descent with modification is often taken as the only essential property of life. This definition notably includes viruses, which do not qualify under narrower definitions as they are acellular and do not metabolise. Broader definitions of life may also include theoretical non-carbon-based life and other alternative biology. Some forms of artificial life, however, especially wet artificial life, might alternatively be classified as real life.
Traditionally people divided living things into plants and animals, this was mainly based upon whether they had the ability to move or not: plants couldn't move, animals could. Originally humans were not considered to be animals, but they treated themselves as a 'higher' form of life, this still survives in common use of the word "animals" which refers to non-human animals. The first known attempt of a real classification of life, based on personal observations, came from the Greek philosopher Aristotle. He classified all living organisms known at that time as either a plant or an animal. Aristotle distinguished animals with blood from animals without blood (or at least without red blood), which can be compared with the concepts of vertebrates and invertebrates respectively. He divided the blooded animals into five groups: viviparous quadrupeds (mammals), birds, oviparous quadrupeds (reptiles and amphibians), fishes and whales. The bloodless animals were also divided into five groups: cephalopods, crustaceans, insects (which also included the spiders, scorpions, and centipedes, in addition to what we now define as insects), shelled animals (such as most molluscs and echinoderms) and "zoophytes". Though Aristotle's work in zoology was not without errors, it was the grandest biological synthesis of the time, and remained the ultimate authority for many centuries after his death. His observations on the anatomy of octopus, cuttlefish, crustaceans, and many other marine invertebrates are remarkably accurate, and could only have been made from first-hand experience with dissection.
The exploration of parts of the New World produced large numbers of new plants and animals that needed descriptions and classification. The old systems made it difficult to study and locate all these new specimens within a collection and often the same plants or animals were given different names because the number of specimens were too large to memorize. A system was needed that could group these specimens together so they could be found, the binomial system was developed based on morphology with groups having similar appearances. In the latter part of the 16th century and the beginning of the 17th, careful study of animals commenced, which, directed first to familiar kinds, was gradually extended until it formed a sufficient body of knowledge to serve as an anatomical basis for classification.
Carolus Linnaeus is best known for his introduction of the method still used to formulate the scientific name of every species. Before Linnaeus, long many-worded names (composed of a generic name and a differentia specifica) had been used, but as these names gave a description of the species, they were not fixed. In his Philosophia Botanica (1751) Linnaeus took every effort to improve the composition and reduce the length of the many-worded names by abolishing unnecessary rhetorics, introducing new descriptive terms and defining their meaning with an unprecedented precision. In the late 1740s Linnaeus began to use a parallel system of naming species with nomina trivialia. Nomen triviale, a trivial name, was a single- or two-word epithet placed on the margin of the page next to the many-worded "scientific" name. The only rules Linnaeus applied to them was that the trivial names should be short, unique within a given genus, and that they should not be changed. Linnaeus consistently applied nomina trivialia to the species of plants in Species Plantarum (1st edn. 1753) and to the species of animals in the 10th edition of Systema Naturae (1758). By consistently using these specific epithets, Linnaeus separated nomenclature from taxonomy. Even though the parallel use of nomina trivialia and many-worded descriptive names continued until late in the eighteenth century, it was gradually replaced by the practice of using shorter proper names combined of the generic name and the trivial name of the species. In the nineteenth century, this new practice was codified in the first Rules and Laws of Nomenclature, and the 1st edn. of Species Plantarum and the 10th edn. of Systema Naturae were chosen as starting points for the Botanical and Zoological Nomenclature respectively. This convention for naming species is referred to as binomial nomenclature. Today, nomenclature is regulated by Nomenclature Codes, which allows names divided into ranks; separately for botany and for zoology. Whereas Linnaeus classified for ease of identification, it is now generally accepted that classification should reflect the Darwinian principle of common descent.
The Fungi have long been a problematic group in the biological classification: Originally, they were treated as plants. For a short period Linnaeus had placed them in the taxon Vermes in Animalia because he was misinformed: the hyphae were said to have been worms. He later placed them back in Plantae. Copeland classified the Fungi in his Protoctista, thus partially avoiding the problem but acknowledging their special status. The problem was eventually solved by Whittaker, when he gave them their own kingdom in his five-kingdom system. As it turned out, the fungi are more closely related to animals than to plants.
As new discoveries enabled us to study cells and microorganisms, new groups of life where revealed, and the fields of cell biology and microbiology were created. These new organisms were originally described separately in Protozoa as animals and Protophyta/Thallophyta as plants, but were united by Haeckel in his kingdom Protista, later the group of prokaryotes were split of in the kingdom Monera, eventually this kingdom would be divided in two separate groups, the Bacteria and the Archaea, leading to the six-kingdom system and eventually to the three-domain system. The 'remaining' protists would later be divided into smaller groups in clades in relation to more complex organisms. Thomas Cavalier-Smith, who has published extensively on the classification of protists, has recently proposed that the Neomura, the clade which groups together the Archaea and Eukarya, would have evolved from Bacteria, more precisely from Actinobacteria.
As microbiology, molecular biology and virology developed, non-cellular reproducing agents were discovered, sometimes these are considered to be alive and are treated in the domain of non-cellular life named Acytota or Aphanobionta.
And thus all the primary taxonomical ranks were established: Domain, Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus, Species
Since the 1960s a trend called cladistics has emerged, arranging taxa in an evolutionary or phylogenetic tree. If a taxon includes all the descendants of some ancestral form, it is called monophyletic, as opposed to paraphyletic, groups based on traits which have evolved separately and where the most recent common ancestor is not included are called polyphyletic.
A new formal code of nomenclature, the PhyloCode, to be renamed "International Code of Phylogenetic Nomenclature" (ICPN), is currently under development, intended to deal with clades, which do not have set ranks, unlike conventional Linnaean taxonomy. It is unclear, should this be implemented, how the different codes will coexist.
k...kZitat:
Zitat von gmansixfo
lmao.
I;m going to bed. Nite mdpr.
nite
Zitat:
Zitat von gmansixfo
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a3...0racist1jz.gifZitat:
Zitat von Jatt101
KKK isn't racist they're just pro white.
(and anti-everything else)
b:tch i go slap youZitat:
Zitat von Jatt101
ª
*Points the cross*Zitat:
Zitat von Darth Budd
Stay back you villain.
*does thing from 30 days of night trailer*Zitat:
Zitat von Jatt101
no god...
xD
http://media.urbandictionary.com/ima...e/xd-16635.jpgZitat:
Zitat von Seven_
Mornin'...
"l like turtles"
[MEDIA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMNry4PE93Y&eurl= http%3A%2F%2Floading%2Ese %2Fforum%2Ephp%3Fthread%5 Fid%3D25489[/MEDIA]
MAH BEATZ!!
http://media.putfile.com/SlamWham-Thing
http://media.putfile.com/Road-Rage-23
http://media.putfile.com/Wip-83
http://media.putfile.com/Best-song-evar-66
-= Double Post =-
I got a joke!Zitat:
Zitat von gmansixfo
What did the bird said when you went sittin on him?
Well?
WELL?! :) GHAHAAH!
Spoiler for answer:
:ROFL:ROFLF:OLO!!!1!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_LeuQXkRWc
w...t....f..... >.0
lulz !Zitat:
Zitat von madsoul
-= Double Post =-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMK5l...elated&search=
the follow on.
Lilz
Lelz
<3Zitat:
Zitat von madsoul
http://file030b.bebo.com/11/large/20...201740403l.gif
*starts to seizure*
http://file030b.bebo.com/11/large/20...201740403l.gif
POWER RAVE!!1
RAVEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE E
**** I hate that word so much.
Milkman is back!!1
ONOEZ!