QJ.net Game Discussion - PSP, Xbox, Wii, PS3, PSP Homebrew, and PSP Guides

**N-Mario** · 09-30-2005, 06:50 PM

Which version of the downgarder (2.00 version changer) is best?

MPH's v0.9 first public beta, or SXT's (http://*******************/) Final v1.0?

Has anyone tested both versions, assuming they both work fine? Has anyone had any problems with their PSPs after the FW changer & downgrade either from using MPH's first public version, or SXT's final version?

I've only tested/used MPH's first public version, and I had no problems with my 1.50 as of yet. However, I never tried SXT's FW changer + downgrade. According to SXT's final version, it fixes many problems that MPH's version had, but I have yet to see this for myself.

So, that is why I am asking which one is a better use? MPH's official first public version, or SXT's Final version?

**Master-Chief** · 09-30-2005, 06:58 PM

They both pretty much do the same thing. It's like comparing the Xbox hacked BIOSes, X2 4983 with X2 4981. There's not much difference considering both get the job done.

**N-Mario** · 09-30-2005, 07:22 PM

Oh okay. I just assumed since one was a more fixed version, that it would cause less damage to your PSP.

However SXT says that MPH's version might cause problems while SXT's version will not cause any problems.

I don't know what the big change is, other than a few bugs fixed, but still only changing the firmware version. Everything else is done with Sony's 1.50 update.

**DogRed9** · 09-30-2005, 07:27 PM

im not trying to be an ass, but yoshi is gonna have to do alot to regain my respect... im just gonna keep usin mph's (assumming i ever try 2.00 again...)

**MIKE3000** · 09-30-2005, 07:36 PM

use mph, forget yoshi and his BS. MPH is proven working, while no one bothers with yoshi.

**Train** · 09-30-2005, 09:05 PM

i am tried yoshi's and i personally am gonna use his "final" release, he gives a good example why on the SXT website, the index.dat could be missing or corrupted with MPH's and poof there goes ur psp, but MPH's works and i give him 95% of the credit for the downgrader, but the final version is more safer

**someone0** · 09-30-2005, 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by N-Mario

However SXT says that MPH's version might cause problems while SXT's version will not cause any problems.

But the SXT version is stolen from MPH, that's probably why it's better

**N-Mario** · 09-30-2005, 09:17 PM

Yea. So the SXT version is better, and have a less chance of crashing, even though the only downside is, that it's stolen?

The only good thing about MPH's version is that it was all made by him. Other than that if anything is missing, you're practically screwed your PSP.

So, if you don't want to worry, or do not care about who made what, who stole what, I assume the SXT version would be a better/safer use.

**ghost9** · 09-30-2005, 09:22 PM

mario i dont think either ones safer.. they both do exactly the same thing

hkese · 09-30-2005, 09:29 PM

MPH's downgrader has been tested for these few days
so is it answered your question?

**someone0** · 09-30-2005, 10:48 PM

I have to 49r33 with hkese that there are more MPH downgrader than the SXT, although SXT have got free advertise from the /.er

hkese · 10-01-2005, 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by someone0

I have to 49r33 with hkese that there are more MPH downgrader than the SXT, although SXT have got free advertise from the /.er

that's what i'm saying
I've downgraded my P$P and everything goes fine

linux_inside v2 · 10-01-2005, 01:19 AM

anyone who installs the downgrader without the index.dat in the first place is an idiot, and with a rar file or a zip, it has a crc check so it ensures that the files are not corrupt.

i used MPH and it worked on mine, the other one would not be any more stable, it would be the same as the other with all the references to MPH removed.

**N-Mario** · 10-01-2005, 06:44 AM

Well I realize they both do the same thing either way, but SXT's version states that there's less chance of it crashing/bricking your PSP with a few bug fixes.

Do/are they just saying those things, and trying to make us use their version, just for attention and credit?

**someone0** · 10-01-2005, 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by N-Mario

Do/are they just saying those things, and trying to make us use their version, just for attention and credit?

I don't think there are any other reason

**ghost9** · 10-01-2005, 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by N-Mario

Well I realize they both do the same thing either way, but SXT's version states that there's less chance of it crashing/bricking your PSP with a few bug fixes.

Do/are they just saying those things, and trying to make us use their version, just for attention and credit?

yeah classic marketing.. they want more people to use their downgrader obviously

**N-Mario** · 10-01-2005, 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ghost9

yeah classic marketing.. they want more people to use their downgrader obviously

That's sad. Really sad. Just as sad as giving up hope on them and losing all their respect because of their childish/stealing acts.

**coldconfession13** · 10-01-2005, 08:56 PM

sxt has one file less to put on the psp, plus on theres the screen froze didnt get a black screen, turned off then downgraded the same as the other one

HotRod11686 · 10-01-2005, 11:55 PM

well i used the MPH downgrader on 2 psp's . same result.. all green no problems.. i did however very rarely encountered some anomilies such as the psp turning off at the home screen without me even touching it.. this happened twice after downgrading within a week's time. hasnt happened since then..
another thing is my WI-FI was not working whatsoever. i fiddled with the settings and turned off the wifi power save feature and what do you know, 100% functionality . well thats pretty much it. my homebrew runs excellent im not complaining at all . excellent work MPH . your my hero

as for anyone who is wondering about SXT . they are a bunch of haters. MPH released the downgrader, it all works excellent . i havent heard of any bricks that came out from his downgrader. unless the person downgrading was a complete retard. oh well

1.50 rocks my world

:mrgreen: MPH IS THE MAN :mrgreen:

09-30-2005, 06:50 PM	#1
N-Mario Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: My House Posts: 363 Trader Feedback: 0	Which Downgarde version is better? (MPH & SXT Related) Which version of the downgarder (2.00 version changer) is best? MPH's v0.9 first public beta, or SXT's (http://*******************/) Final v1.0? Has anyone tested both versions, assuming they both work fine? Has anyone had any problems with their PSPs after the FW changer & downgrade either from using MPH's first public version, or SXT's final version? I've only tested/used MPH's first public version, and I had no problems with my 1.50 as of yet. However, I never tried SXT's FW changer + downgrade. According to SXT's final version, it fixes many problems that MPH's version had, but I have yet to see this for myself. So, that is why I am asking which one is a better use? MPH's official first public version, or SXT's Final version?

09-30-2005, 06:58 PM	#2
Master-Chief Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 530 Trader Feedback: 0	They both pretty much do the same thing. It's like comparing the Xbox hacked BIOSes, X2 4983 with X2 4981. There's not much difference considering both get the job done.

09-30-2005, 07:22 PM	#3
N-Mario Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: My House Posts: 363 Trader Feedback: 0	Oh okay. I just assumed since one was a more fixed version, that it would cause less damage to your PSP. However SXT says that MPH's version might cause problems while SXT's version will not cause any problems. I don't know what the big change is, other than a few bugs fixed, but still only changing the firmware version. Everything else is done with Sony's 1.50 update.

09-30-2005, 07:27 PM	#4
DogRed9 Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 96 Trader Feedback: 0	im not trying to be an ass, but yoshi is gonna have to do alot to regain my respect... im just gonna keep usin mph's (assumming i ever try 2.00 again...)

09-30-2005, 07:36 PM	#5
MIKE3000 Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 119 Trader Feedback: 0	use mph, forget yoshi and his BS. MPH is proven working, while no one bothers with yoshi.

09-30-2005, 09:05 PM	#6
Train 2335 Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 1,187 Trader Feedback: 0	i am tried yoshi's and i personally am gonna use his "final" release, he gives a good example why on the SXT website, the index.dat could be missing or corrupted with MPH's and poof there goes ur psp, but MPH's works and i give him 95% of the credit for the downgrader, but the final version is more safer

09-30-2005, 09:17 PM	#8
N-Mario Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: My House Posts: 363 Trader Feedback: 0	Yea. So the SXT version is better, and have a less chance of crashing, even though the only downside is, that it's stolen? The only good thing about MPH's version is that it was all made by him. Other than that if anything is missing, you're practically screwed your PSP. So, if you don't want to worry, or do not care about who made what, who stole what, I assume the SXT version would be a better/safer use.

09-30-2005, 09:22 PM	#9
ghost9 Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: PA Posts: 468 Trader Feedback: 0	mario i dont think either ones safer.. they both do exactly the same thing

09-30-2005, 09:29 PM	#10
hkese Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 39 Trader Feedback: 0	MPH's downgrader has been tested for these few days so is it answered your question?

09-30-2005, 10:48 PM	#11
someone0 Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 350 Trader Feedback: 0	I have to 49r33 with hkese that there are more MPH downgrader than the SXT, although SXT have got free advertise from the /.er

10-01-2005, 01:19 AM	#13
linux_inside v2 Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 12 Trader Feedback: 0	anyone who installs the downgrader without the index.dat in the first place is an idiot, and with a rar file or a zip, it has a crc check so it ensures that the files are not corrupt. i used MPH and it worked on mine, the other one would not be any more stable, it would be the same as the other with all the references to MPH removed.

10-01-2005, 06:44 AM	#14
N-Mario Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: My House Posts: 363 Trader Feedback: 0	Well I realize they both do the same thing either way, but SXT's version states that there's less chance of it crashing/bricking your PSP with a few bug fixes. Do/are they just saying those things, and trying to make us use their version, just for attention and credit?

10-01-2005, 08:56 PM	#18
coldconfession13 Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 156 Trader Feedback: 0	sxt has one file less to put on the psp, plus on theres the screen froze didnt get a black screen, turned off then downgraded the same as the other one

10-01-2005, 11:55 PM	#19
HotRod11686 Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 9 Trader Feedback: 0	well i used the MPH downgrader on 2 psp's . same result.. all green no problems.. i did however very rarely encountered some anomilies such as the psp turning off at the home screen without me even touching it.. this happened twice after downgrading within a week's time. hasnt happened since then.. another thing is my WI-FI was not working whatsoever. i fiddled with the settings and turned off the wifi power save feature and what do you know, 100% functionality . well thats pretty much it. my homebrew runs excellent im not complaining at all . excellent work MPH . your my hero as for anyone who is wondering about SXT . they are a bunch of haters. MPH released the downgrader, it all works excellent . i havent heard of any bricks that came out from his downgrader. unless the person downgrading was a complete retard. oh well 1.50 rocks my world :mrgreen: MPH IS THE MAN :mrgreen:

QJ.net Game Discussion - PSP, Xbox, Wii, PS3, PSP Homebrew, and PSP Guides

Which Downgarde version is better? (MPH & SXT Related)