![]() |
| Forums | Gaming News | Videos | Downloads | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Chat | FAQ | Members List | Contact |
| ||||||
This is a discussion on The updater news on the front page, what is it all about? within the PSP Homebrew and Hacks Discussion forums, part of the PSP Development, Hacks, and Homebrew category; Is it something that only Those doing coding in the scene should check out?...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#2 | |
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
[CENTER][B][COLOR="Lime"]PROGRESS IS A SLOW PROCESS....[/COLOR][/B][/CENTER] [B][I]PSP-3003 PB Firmware 5.00 And Gave Up Waiting Sold And Got A 360 :p[/I][/B] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
I wanna know if since the Eloader will be in UPDATE mode, can the Eloader run Unsigned/modified Update Eboots? I know some commands will have to be altered, added, removed and whatnot, but will an Update Eboot actually RUN?
-Sh2DaK- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() ![]() Jesus loves me more.
|
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
![]() ![]() Rock Star
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Could you explain as to why not having Flash0 access would stop an Update EBOOT from simply starting? Maybe you missunderstood my question, put simply, will an update eboot run, will it open? I'm not interested in whether it will actually do anything as of now, but will it open to it's Start Menu?
If you understood me completely and your reply was infact toward this question, then apologies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Quote:
Could you, or someone just completely clarify this for me. Obviously i don't want to have false information. What i have from this is that you need 2 things both at the same time, in-order for flash "access": 1. The program must be Signed. 2. You must be in a Flash capable PSP Mode. Is this correct? -Sh2DaK- |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Quote:
You didn't clarify what i wanted but ok... i know about the added security for 2.6, although for 2.5 is anyone 100% certain now that "new" security was added. I know that there has been alot of confusion with it. ...but basically, i was right all along, and you just thought i was a retard that had no idea what has flash access and what doesn't? Put simply, flash access is dependant on what mode it is in, and if one has accomplished flash access in that mode, the program will run fine. Also, before you reply to the end of this with something such as "Yes, but unsigned eboots don't have flash access". I know the complications already, i said "put simply". Sorry but, your posts just seem to be underminding. You act as if i know nothing, when all i require are simple answers, but you add unnecessary things such as "There's a slim chance that 2.01 might get a downgrader but 2.5 and up is pretty much hopeless" and "understand?" - Of course i understand, and in your last post you've just proven me right and that you've been needlessly blabbering on about CRAP.. -Sh2DaK- |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| front , news , page , updater |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|